The Child as Witness

The Child as Witness

One of the most powerful currents in Lost in the Lost and Found is the voice of the child who sees what others refuse to see. The child in these poems is not a decorative figure of innocence. She is a witness. She watches cruelty, abandonment, spiritual confusion, grief, hypocrisy, and silence. Again and again, the poems ask why suffering is ignored simply because the sufferer is young.

This witness voice appears early in poems about the forgotten, the lonely, and the unheard. Later, it becomes sharper and more direct. The collection returns repeatedly to the danger of not listening: not listening to children, not listening to pain, not listening to truth, not listening to those who cry out in silence. In this way, the book becomes more than a private diary of feeling. It becomes a moral record of what happens when a child understands that the adult world often protects itself by refusing to know.

The title Lost in the Lost and Found carries this tension beautifully. A lost-and-found is supposed to be a place of recovery. It is where misplaced things are gathered until someone claims them. But to be “lost in the lost and found” suggests something more painful: even the place meant for restoration has failed to restore. The child has been put somewhere, kept somewhere, perhaps even preserved somewhere, but not yet truly claimed. The title becomes an image for the poems themselves. They are the saved pieces: pages that might have been thrown away, hidden, forgotten, or destroyed, but instead remained.

The collection’s darker poems should not be softened into mere adolescent moodiness. They are part of the witness structure of the book. A child may not possess adult literary theory, but a child can recognize abandonment. A child can recognize injustice. A child can recognize when her own pain is being denied. The plainness of some lines gives them force because they do not hide behind sophistication. They say, in effect: this happened inside me, and I wrote it down because I had to.

That act of writing is central. In the author’s background note, writing is connected to purpose, calling, preservation, and obedience: write, save the writings, there will be a time for people to read them. That instruction changes the meaning of the book. These poems are not only expressions of feeling. They are saved testimony. They are proof that the child was present, that the child perceived, and that the child found a language strong enough to survive what she could not yet fully explain.

Leave a comment

From the blog

About the Author: Sarah B. Royal

Sarah B. Royal’s writing defies convention. Her poetry and prose traverse the boundaries between structure and spontaneity, often weaving together philosophical inquiry, cultural reflection, and personal narrative. With a background in experimental literature, she is known for crafting works that challenge readers to engage intellectually and emotionally.

Her acclaimed palindrome performance play, 777 – A Story of Idol Worship and Murder, showcases her fascination with mirrored storytelling and thematic symmetry. In o x ∞ = ♥: The Poet and The Mathematician, Royal explores the intersection of poetic intuition and mathematical logic, revealing a unique voice that is both analytical and lyrical.

Royal’s collections—such as Lost in the Lost and Found, Haiku For You, Lantern and Tanka Too, and the WoPoLi Chapbook Series—highlight her commitment to neurodivergent expression and poetic experimentation. Whether through childhood verse or contemporary fusion poetry, her work invites readers into a world where language is both a tool and a playground.

Sarah B. Royal continues to expand the possibilities of poetic form, offering readers a deeply personal yet universally resonant experience. Her writing is a testament to the power of creative risk, intellectual depth, and emotional authenticity.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started