The Fold as Poetic Structure

  1. The Fold as Poetic Structure

Kushnir’s fold challenges the assumption that poems must move gradually between ideas. In a fold-based poem, distant images are not connected by an explanatory transition. They are made immediately adjacent.

This produces what may be called zero-distance metaphor. Instead of saying that one thing resembles another, the poem makes the two things occupy the same grammatical or visual position. Comparison becomes contact.

Instructions for Crossing a River Without Moving

Mark Point A: the kitchen after midnight.
Mark Point B: the border checkpoint in winter.
Do not draw a road between them.
Fold until the refrigerator light
falls across the guard’s face.
Fold again until my mother’s grocery list
is stamped with an exit visa:
milk
bread
apples
permission to return
The river does not need a bridge
when both banks are the same sentence.
At Point A, she is washing a cup.
At Point B, the cup is being searched.
Bring the corners together.
Now the water runs through the cupboard.
Now the checkpoint tastes of soap.
Do not unfold.
Someone is still trying to cross.

The poem explicitly enacts the fold. A domestic kitchen and a political border are established as distant points, but the speaker refuses to connect them through a journey. Instead, the page is conceptually folded until the refrigerator light illuminates the guard and the grocery list becomes a travel document.

The metaphor is not “a border checkpoint is like a kitchen.” The two spaces are forced into the same textual location. The cup is simultaneously being washed and searched. Water runs through the cupboard and the political checkpoint acquires the taste of soap.

This contact changes both zones. The kitchen is no longer entirely safe or private. The checkpoint is no longer abstract or geographically distant. Domestic life becomes political, while state power enters the household.

A poet can practice this form by identifying two apparently unrelated semantic locations and forbidding any conventional transition between them. The poem should not explain how the speaker traveled from one place to the other. Instead, an object, verb, or grammatical structure should exist in both places at once.

The repeated command “fold” also gives the poem a physical poetics. The reader is encouraged to imagine the page as an object whose surface can be altered. Meaning results from topology rather than sequence.

Leave a comment

About the Author: Sarah B. Royal

Sarah B. Royal’s writing defies convention. Her poetry and prose traverse the boundaries between structure and spontaneity, often weaving together philosophical inquiry, cultural reflection, and personal narrative. With a background in experimental literature, she is known for crafting works that challenge readers to engage intellectually and emotionally.

Her acclaimed palindrome performance play, 777 – A Story of Idol Worship and Murder, showcases her fascination with mirrored storytelling and thematic symmetry. In o x ∞ = ♥: The Poet and The Mathematician, Royal explores the intersection of poetic intuition and mathematical logic, revealing a unique voice that is both analytical and lyrical.

Royal’s collections—such as Lost in the Lost and Found, Haiku For You, Lantern and Tanka Too, and the WoPoLi Chapbook Series—highlight her commitment to neurodivergent expression and poetic experimentation. Whether through childhood verse or contemporary fusion poetry, her work invites readers into a world where language is both a tool and a playground.

Sarah B. Royal continues to expand the possibilities of poetic form, offering readers a deeply personal yet universally resonant experience. Her writing is a testament to the power of creative risk, intellectual depth, and emotional authenticity.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started